<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>this call affirms the need of the patend system</title>
		<link>http://www.ethipat.org/forum/t-15079/this-call-affirms-the-need-of-the-patend-system</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;this call affirms the need of the patend system&quot; - Can a system, based on the current patent philosophy  fulfill the objectives?</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.ethipat.org/forum/t-15079#post-37680</guid>
				<title>this call affirms the need of the patend system</title>
				<link>http://www.ethipat.org/forum/t-15079/this-call-affirms-the-need-of-the-patend-system#post-37680</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wibeau</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>28670</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Although I sympathies with the action I have some doubts to sign.<br /> For me it is not so clear if the current patent system is necessary.<br /> So a more statement :<br /> "I call the EU to build a new innovation investment protection system"</p> <p>would be more preferable.</p> <p>Knowledge can not be owned by someone.<br /> Patents pretends this is the case.</p> <p>Investment in innovation should be earned back excellence knowledge of the matter and experiences.<br /> A certain protection of an implementation could be accepted. If patents would be limited to this only then the call could stay like it is formulated now.</p> <p>Wim</p> <p>check also this , about a new "free" scientific research publications.<br /> <a href="http://open-access.web.cern.ch/Open-Access/">http://open-access.web.cern.ch/Open-Access/</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>